armchair-factotum:

jetpackexhaust:

The Malcom Fallacy

Dr Malcolm perfectly captured the problem with too much moralizing sci-fi when he whined “your scientists were so preoccupied with whether they could that they didn’t stop to think if they should.”Because of course they should! “Should we recreate awesome dinosaurs*?” The answer is obviously yes, utterly yes, that’s the positive control case to test absolute YESness. You don’t ask people that question to find the answer, you already know the answer, you ask people that question to find out if they’re worth talking to.

*a scaled pseudospecies distinct from feathered “actual dinosaurs”.

The real problem is the wrong people asking the wrong questions, then blaming science for delivering overwhelming  experimental evidence of their mistakes. Jurassic Park’s key question wasn’t “Should we recreate awesome dinosaurs?”, it was “Should we unleash those awesome dinosaurs on a safari with worse security and fewer staff than the average Apple store?” No, you shouldn’t have done that. The science spectacularly succeeded in delivering a dinosaur miracle, and then specifically didn’t knock them out of the Park because that tourism screw-up’s entirely on capitalism. No scientist was collecting data for “Quantifying how much money we can make from tourism” or “Material testing the flimsiest fences imaginable with a goddamn Tyrannosaurus Rex”.

That’s the Malcolm Fallacy: blaming science for everyone else’s mistakes. You’ll see it in almost every techno-horror.

  • Should we invent AI? Yes! Should we connect it to military mainframes with nuclear launch authority? No!
  • Should we research viruses? Yes! Should we override the security computer and physically crack open sealed airtight doors when viral labs go into lockdown? No!
  • Should we research teleportation? Yes! Should we experiment on ourselves, alone, without even the most elementary laboratory (or even pizza parlor) standards of cleanliness? No!

Almost every sci-fi horror plot is driven by money-grubbing corporations but it’s the researchers who can’t even afford a change of clothes from their “I’m a scientist!” lab coats who take the blame. And now we have hordes of idiots destroying cropfields and resurrecting defeated diseases while CEOs gold-plate profit reports on basic medicine. 

This and more at ZERO POINT COMEDY

You’d think Microsoft’s learning AI becoming a nazi because of nazis on the internet getting access to it would have taught us that the AI isn’t the problem

darkpuck:

lanqu-e:

juliandevorak-md:

Not to be that dick, but some people in the fandom really are in denial about what Lucio has done. I keep seeing people claim we ‘don’t know that he’s evil, it’s all just rumours’ and I’m like… what? Let Lucio be evil, don’t turn him into a weepy ‘I had no choice’ villain please.

He has enslaved people.

He has blackmailed a village.

He has ripped people’s hearts out.

He did neglect his people and let them starve, let their districts flood.

He did kill his father.

He did try to kill his mother.

And those are just a few that are mentioned or shown, that I remember right now. If I go through the whole story again I’m sure I’ll find more.

Clearly I’m not saying you can’t like Lucio – hell I do – but don’t pretend like he’s some misunderstood wounded man who only looks evil because of lies.

The best argument you could make is saying he’s not malicious but rather indifferent, and that is still evil.

im dying i couldnt understand what the fuck happened cus i thought this was about happy dj frog man

OP’s tags mentions “the arcana” i have no idea what that is bUT REST ASSURED OVERWATCH FANS IT ISN’T HAPPY DJ FROG MAN

i believe ‘the arcana’ is a phone game where you solve the mystery of the nobleman lucio while romancing one of three characters, also lucio is not quite as dead as everyone thought?? 

mymuffintopiswholegrainlofat:

hikergirl:

“The first is that diets do not work. Not just paleo or Atkins or Weight Watchers or Goop, but all diets. Since 1959, research has shown that 95 to 98 percent of attempts to lose weight fail and that two-thirds of dieters gain back more than they lost. The reasons are biological and irreversible. As early as 1969, research showed that losing just 3 percent of your body weight resulted in a 17 percent slowdown in your metabolism—a body-wide starvation response that blasts you with hunger hormones and drops your internal temperature until you rise back to your highest weight. Keeping weight off means fighting your body’s energy-regulation system and battling hunger all day, every day, for the rest of your life.”

This article hits home and is spot on. Diets do not work. Weight Watchers, South Beach, the your mom’s 1962 diet DO NOT WORK. Diets fuck up your metabolism and are a recipe for failure. Diet culture in western countries prey upon fear and shame.

I could go on and on. Great article.

iesika:

winterwombat:

I propose a new rule for journalism in politics: Every article complaining about how much something is costing on taxpayers needs to include the estimated per-capita cost, alongside whatever giant number they use to scare people. 

“This new initiative would cost taxpayers $10 million* annually, a gigantic burden that already over-taxed citizens shouldn’t have to shoulder.” 

“*or about $0.15 per person”

I would like it to also include “This is equivalent to _____% of the estimated taxes not being paid due to corporations hiding their money offshore”

fleamontpotter:

siniristiriita:

It’s the year 2030. They’re making a Harry Potter remake, not a modern adaptation but set in the original era. And it’s fucking indulgent in 90s nostalgia. Someone’s got a butterfly clip, Ron is wearing a choker, there’s muggles playing with pogs, Spice Girls is playing in the background. Voldemort is wearing a crop top.

It’s simultaneously the worst and fucking best thing you’ve ever seen.

hedwig is just a furby on a string